Most limits never need the epsilon-delta definition. They fall to a handful of
rules plus one theorem.
The limit laws
If limx→af(x)=L and limx→ag(x)=M, both existing:
| Law | Statement |
|---|
| Sum | lim(f+g)=L+M |
| Difference | lim(f−g)=L−M |
| Constant multiple | lim(cf)=cL |
| Product | lim(fg)=LM |
| Quotient | lim(f/g)=L/M, provided M=0 |
| Power | limfn=Ln |
For polynomials and rational functions with non-zero denominator, this reduces
to substitution: put x=a in and evaluate.
x→2lim(3x2−5x+1)=3(4)−5(2)+1=3
Where substitution fails
Substitution breaks when it produces something meaningless:
00,∞∞,0⋅∞,∞−∞,1∞,00,∞0
These are the indeterminate forms. Indeterminate does not mean "no limit" —
it means this method cannot tell you. The limit may exist, may be anything at
all, and needs a different technique.
Contrast 05, which is not indeterminate: it tells you the
function grows without bound.
Technique 1: factor and cancel
x→1limx−1x2−1
Substitution gives 0/0. But for x=1:
x−1x2−1=x−1(x−1)(x+1)=x+1
The cancellation is legal precisely because the limit never evaluates at
x=1 — the same exclusion from the definition, doing useful work.
x→1limx−1x2−1=x→1lim(x+1)=2
Technique 2: L'Hopital's rule
If limx→af(x)=limx→ag(x)=0, or both are ±∞, and
g′(x)=0 near a, then
x→alimg(x)f(x)=x→alimg′(x)f′(x)
provided the right-hand limit exists.
Differentiate the numerator and denominator separately. It is not the
quotient rule and looks nothing like it.
Three standard limits worth memorising
x→0limxsinx=1x→0limxex−1=1x→0limx21−cosx=21
Check the third with L'Hopital, applied twice:
x→0limx21−cosx=0/0x→0lim2xsinx=0/0x→0lim2cosx=21
Each application needs its own 0/0 check. The second step is legal only
because sinx→0 and 2x→0.
The mistake examiners look for
Applying L'Hopital when the form is not indeterminate.
x→0limx+1x+2=12=2by substitution
Misapplying L'Hopital gives lim11=1 — wrong. The rule is not a
general shortcut for quotients; it is a theorem with a hypothesis. Check the
form first, every time.