Limits Revisited
You met limits in Plus-Two. This is the same idea stated precisely enough to build the rest of calculus on.
The idea in one sentence
means: as gets close to , gets close to — and we can make as close to as we like by taking close enough to .
The part students consistently get wrong
The limit at says nothing about .
It is about the values of at points near , deliberately excluding itself. Three separate situations, all with the same limit:
| Situation | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3 | |
| at | 3 | 3 |
| for , | 100 | 3 |
In the third row the function is defined at 2, and the limit still ignores it. The limit is what you would expect the value to be from the surrounding behaviour, whether or not the function obliges.
The formal definition
means: for every there is a such that
Read it as a challenge and a response. Someone challenges you with a tolerance — "get within this much of ". You must respond with a — "stay within this much of and you will". If you can always answer, the limit exists.
Note . That strict inequality is what excludes itself.
One-sided limits, and the existence test
The test: the two-sided limit exists if and only if both one-sided limits exist and are equal.
The standard counterexample
For this is . For it is .
The one-sided limits disagree, so does not exist. The graph jumps from to with nothing bridging the gap.
The same reasoning applies to the unit step function, and to any function defined piecewise where the pieces do not meet.
Why this matters for what follows
The derivative is defined as a limit. Continuity is defined using a limit. If the limit machinery is shaky, everything built on it is too — which is why this apparently basic topic is the first thing in the syllabus.